Cases
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Natural Answers, Inc., 233 F.3d 456 (7th Cir. November 21, 2000) Defendant's use of Plaintiff's mark in the meta tags within the source code of its web site is probative of its wrongful intent and justifies weighing that factor heavily in the likelihood of confusion analysis.
- Playboy Enterprises Inc. v. Calvin Designer Label (N.D. Ca.September 8, 1997) Preliminarily enjoining defendants form using PLAYMATELIVE or "playboyxxx.com" or "playmatelive.com", as Defendants' domain name, directory name, or other such computer address, as the name of Defendants Web site service, in buried code or metatags on their home page or Web pages.
- Playboy v. Welles Legal documents and articles about the case.
- The State Bar Of California Standing Committee On Professional Responsibility And Conduct Formal Opinion No. 2001-155 While an attorney web site is a "communication" within the meaning of California Rule of Professional Conduct 1-400(A), it is not a "solicitation" under rule 1-400(B).
Statutes
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|