{"id":352357,"date":"2023-10-20T14:55:30","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T19:55:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ability-fl-prod.internetbrands.com\/ability-law\/criminal\/criminal-rights\/faqs-police-interrogations.html"},"modified":"2026-07-10T14:55:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-10T19:55:00","slug":"faqs-police-interrogations","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.findlaw.com\/criminal\/criminal-rights\/faqs-police-interrogations.html","title":{"rendered":"What Police Can and Can’t Do in Interrogations"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

What Police Can and Can't Do in Interrogations<\/h1>\n\n
\n
\n By Christie Nicholson, J.D.<\/a> | Legally reviewed by Laura Temme, Esq.<\/a>\n | Last updated\n
\n \n <\/i>\n Legally Reviewed\n <\/summary>\n\n
\n

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy, clarity, and style by FindLaw\u2019s team of legal writers and attorneys<\/a> and in accordance with our editorial standards<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/details>\n\n

\n \n <\/i>\n Fact-Checked\n <\/summary>\n\n
\n

The last updated date refers to the last time this article was reviewed by FindLaw or one of our contributing authors<\/a>. We make every effort to keep our articles updated. For information regarding a specific legal issue affecting you, please contact an attorney in your area<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/details>\n<\/section>\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n

Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n

Police interrogations<\/span> are custodial questioning sessions where law enforcement<\/span> officers<\/span> question suspects about alleged crimes while respecting certain constitutional limits. Officers can use psychological tactics and even lie to suspects, but they cannot violate Miranda rights<\/span>, force self-incrimination<\/span>, or deny access to an attorney. Understanding these boundaries helps protect your constitutional rights<\/span> during police questioning<\/span>.<\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

If you believe what you see on television and in the movies, law enforcement<\/span> is allowed to do whatever it takes to get a confession<\/a> from a criminal suspect. The truth is that, while the police can engage in questionable interrogation tactics, there are some things they cannot do.<\/p>\n

Here, we’ll discuss the tactics law enforcement<\/span> employs when questioning someone about a crime. We will describe some of the deceptive tactics<\/span> officers are permitted to use, as well as interrogation techniques<\/span><\/a> the courts deem unlawful.<\/p>\n

If you’re involved in a criminal case and believe the police have violated your constitutional rights<\/span>, consult a criminal defense attorney<\/span><\/a> immediately.<\/p>\n

What Qualifies as an Interrogation?<\/h2>\n

Before we discuss a suspect’s rights during a police interrogation<\/span>, it’s important to understand what an interrogation is. An interrogation occurs when police question<\/span> someone about a crime. However, not all interrogations trigger the same constitutional protections.<\/p>\n

The key distinction is between custodial<\/strong> and non-custodial<\/span><\/strong> interrogations<\/span>. A custodial interrogation<\/span> occurs when police question<\/span> someone who is not free to leave. This doesn’t necessarily mean the person is under arrest<\/a>\u2014it simply means they cannot leave until the officer says they can.<\/p>\n

The constitutional rights<\/span><\/a> that attach during a custodial interrogation<\/span> (such as Miranda <\/span><\/em>warnings<\/span>) don’t apply to casual conversations or non-custodial interviews where the person is free to walk away at any time.<\/p>\n

When law enforcement<\/span> takes someone into custody for questioning, they must issue a Miranda warning<\/span>. When they invite someone to participate in a voluntary interview where the person is free to leave, they are not required to do so.<\/p>\n

What Happens During Police Interrogations<\/span>?<\/h2>\n

Most police interrogations<\/span><\/a> follow a common pattern. First, the officers introduce themselves to the suspect in custody and explain the purpose of the interview. The officers will then ask a broad question and give the suspect a chance to narrate their version of events.<\/p>\n

The officers may interrupt this narrative at certain points, trying to glean key information<\/a> about the alleged crime they are investigating. They will also take notes of what the suspect says throughout the interrogation.<\/p>\n

Throughout the interrogation, the officers will employ various questioning techniques. For instance, some cops push hard for a voluntary confession<\/span><\/a> by the suspect. In other cases, the officers conducting the interview show the suspect pictures of the crime scene<\/span>, trying to shock the individual into confessing. The specific interrogation technique<\/span> will depend on the facts of the case and the stage of the investigation.<\/p>\n

Once the officers are done asking their questions, they will decide how the interrogation will end. This will depend on what the suspect tells them during the meeting. It will also depend partly on whatever evidence law enforcement<\/span> already has.<\/p>\n

Legal Interrogation Techniques<\/span><\/h2>\n

The rules for police interrogations<\/span> are not set in stone. Members of law enforcement<\/span> learn their interrogation tactics through training and from one another. Officers adopt the techniques that work best for them. Some people would be surprised by the kinds of things police can get away with during a suspect interview.<\/p>\n

Some of the more common techniques officers use when interrogating a suspect include:<\/p>\n

The Reid Technique<\/h3>\n

The Reid technique is a commonly used interrogation tactic developed in the 1950s by former Chicago police officer<\/span> John E. Reid. It involves a factual analysis coupled with a psychological analysis of the suspect and the crime scene<\/span> before the interrogation even begins. Then, investigators will try to gather baseline information from the suspect by having what feels like a non-accusatory conversation. The goal is to minimize the guilt the suspect may feel to elicit a confession.<\/p>\n

If they believe the suspect is guilty, the investigator will transition to a more structured interrogation format. They’ll often outright tell the suspect that the evidence points to their guilt (whether it actually does or not). They’ll put pressure on the suspect to confess by offering help or sympathy in exchange for a confession. The interrogator might suggest a moral or psychological justification for the crime (e.g., it was an accident or that the victim provoked it).<\/p>\n

Critics argue that this technique has the potential to lead to false confessions<\/span> from innocent people<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The PEACE Method<\/h3>\n

This is a five-step process law enforcement<\/span> uses during interrogations. The five steps are meant to slowly make the suspect comfortable enough to confess to the crime. The steps are as follows:<\/p>\n