Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

American Meat Inst. v. Leeman, No. D053325

By FindLaw Staff on December 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action by the plaintiffs-American Meat Institute and National Meat Association seeking a declaration that the consumer warnings required by the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 are preempted by the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA), judgment in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed where: 1) the trial court properly overruled the demurrer; and 2) FMIA expressly preempts point of sale warning requirements imposed by Proposition 65 with respect to meat, and on that basis the trial court's ruling on the motion for summary judgment is affirmed.     

Read American Meat Inst. v. Leeman, No. D053325 [HTML]

Read American Meat Inst. v. Leeman, No. D053325 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed December 22, 2009


Opinion by Judge Irion

For Appellant:   Morrison & Foerster, Michele B. Corash, Maria Chedid, William F. Tarantino and Joanna E. Herman

For Appellee:  Hirst & Chanler, Clifford A. Chanler and David Lavine

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard