Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Azure Ltd. v. I-Flow Corp., No. S164884

By FindLaw Staff on July 17, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Court of Appeals judgment is affirmed where a corporation is entitled to immunity under the Unclaimed Property Law only if it complies with the Law, and thus does not immunize corporations like defendant who allegedly transfer nonescheated shares to the state without giving the required notice.    

Read Azure Ltd. v. I-Flow Corp., No. S164884 in PDF

Read Azure Ltd. v. I-Flow Corp., No. S164884 in HTML

Appellate Information
Appeal from Orange County Super. Ct. No. 06CC07434.
Filed July 16, 2009

Judges
Before BAXTER, J., GEORGE, C.J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., MORENO, J., CORRIGAN, J., KENNARD, J.
Opinion by CHIN, J.
Dissenting Opinion by MORENO, J.

Counsel
For Appellant: Shapiro, Rodarte & Forman, Carl W. Shapiro, Theresa Z. Youhanaie, Leora D. Freedman and Thomas W. Foote.

For Respondent: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Jeffrey H. Reeves, J. Scot Kennedy, John N. Carter and Julian W. Poon.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard