Baker Manock & Jensen v. Superior Court of Fresno County, No. F056973

Petition by writ of mandate seeking to vacate an order disqualifying plaintiff from serving as attorneys for any party in the probate action pending before the trial court is granted where the court erred in finding that the law firm had a conflict of interest in representing both the executor and the beneficiary under the circumstances presented.          

Read Baker Manock & Jensen v. Superior Court of Fresno County, No. F056973 in PDF

Read Baker Manock & Jensen v. Superior Court of Fresno County, No. F056973 in HTML

Appellate Information
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of mandate. Debra J. Kazanjian, Judge.
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Filed July 22, 2009

Judges
Before VARTABEDIAN, Acting P.J., HILL, J., KANE, J.
Opinion by VARTABEDIAN, Acting P.J.

Counsel
For Petitioner: Robie & Matthai, Edith R. Matthai and Steven S. Fleischman.
For Real Party in Interest: Chielpegian Law Offices, Elliott D. Chielpegian, Michael S. Chielpegian and Lee S. W. Cobb.