Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Blue Cross of Ca., Inc. v. Sup. Ct., No. B215035

By FindLaw Staff on December 16, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action arising out of a lawsuit filed by a city attorney against a health insurer and others concerning coverage rescission practices, defendants' petition for a writ of mandate to reverse trial court's ruling denying their demurrer to the complaint is denied as the California Department of Managed Health Care's regulatory and enforcement authority does not preclude the city attorney form pursuing the unfair competition and false advertising claims. 

Read Blue Cross of Ca., Inc. v. Sup. Ct., No. B215035 [HTML]

Read Blue Cross of Ca., Inc. v. Sup. Ct., No. B215035 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed December 15, 2009


Opinion by Judge Rothschild

For Appellant:   Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Richard S. Odom, Kathleen A. Waters, Thomas M. Peterson and Molly Moriarty Lane

For Appellee:   Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Jeffrey B. Isaacs, Chief Assistant City Attorney, James W. Colbert, III, and Anthony M. Miera, Assistant City Attorneys

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard