Branner v. Regents of the Univ. of California, No. C061476
Appeal of a trial court order granting in part and denying in part defendants' special motion to strike plaintiff's race and age discrimination claims is dismissed where: 1) plaintiff's notice of appeal was untimely filed under California Rules of Court 8.104(a), and his motion to reconsider both failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Code of Civ. Pro. sec. 1008 (a) and was invalid as it did not contain an affidavit or declaration in support of the motion; 2) defendant's cross-appeal is untimely and must be dismissed; and 3) the order denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration was not appealable.
Read Branner v. Regents of the Univ. of California, No. C061476 in PDF
Read Branner v. Regents of the Univ. of California, No. C061476 in HTML
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, Doris L. Shockley, Judge. Dismissed.
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
Filed July 14, 2009
Before SIMS, Acting P.J., RAYE, J., CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.
Opinion by the Court
For Plaintiff: Mary-Alice Coleman.
For Defendant: Michael T. Lucey, George A. Acero and Gordon & Rees.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.