Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Buesa v. City of Los Angeles, No. B212854

By FindLaw Staff on October 05, 2009 12:50 PM

In plaintiff-police officers' lawsuit against the city of Los Angeles under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA) claiming that a perjured declaration submitted by the city deprived them of their statute of limitations defense in an administrative mandamus proceeding over their discharges, judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant is affirmed as plaintiffs' action under POBRA is barred because it constitutes an impermissible collateral attack on the mandate judgment. 

Read Buesa v. City of Los Angeles, No. B212854

Filed October 3, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Epstein

Counsel

For Appellant:  Law Office of David W. Allor and David W. Allor

For Appelle:  Rockard J. Delgadillo and Carmen Trutanich, City Attorneys, and Paul L. Winnemore, Deputy City Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard