Cabral v. Martins, No., A120657
In plaintiff's action against her ex-husband and various others including several attorneys involving their alleged participation to conceal assets to avoid child support, grant of attorney's special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute and award of attorneys' fees is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's cause of action is predicated on protected activity under the anti-SLAPP statute and the probate proceedings and the litigation defense were protected petitioning activity for purposes of the anti-SLAPP statute; 2) plaintiff did not show a probability of success on the merits; and 3) plaintiff did not demonstrate any abuse of the trial court's discretion in determining the appropriate amount of attorney fees to award.
Read Cabral v. Martins, No., A120657
Filed September 4, 2009
Opinion by Judge Ruvolo
For Appellant: Law Offices of Stephen G. Opperwall
For Respondent: Drath, Clifford, Murphy & Hagen, Ray Z. Bacerdo, Kelly M. Flanagan, Phillips, Greenberg & Hauser, Jerry Hauser
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.