Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

California Bldg. Indus. Ass'n v. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control Dist., No. F055448

By FindLaw Staff on October 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a challenge to two rules adopted by respondent-Air Pollution Control District (District), trial court's judgment in favor of District is affirmed as the District had the power to adopt the indirect source review (ISR), intended to encourage developers to reduce indirect pollution caused by new development projects, and the fees imposed pursuant to those rules are valid regulatory fees.     

Read California Bldg. Indus. Ass'n v. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control Dist., No. F055448

Filed October 6, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Levy

Counsel

For Appellant:  Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, David P. Lanferman and James F. Rusk; Law Offices of Walter P. McNeill and Walter P. McNeill

For Appelle:  Philip M. Jay and Catherine T. Redmond

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard