Canandaigua Wine Co. v. County of Madera, No. F055858
Plaintiff's appeal from an order summarily adjudicating one of the three causes of action in its petition for writ of administrative mandate involving the assessment of a winery is dismissed where a ruling on a petition for writ of mandate is not appealable if other causes of action remain pending between the parties.
Read Canandaigua Wine Co. v. County of Madera, No. F055858
Filed September 2, 2009
Opinion by Judge Levy
For Appellant: Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III, Amanda L. Groves, Troy M. Van Dongen and Kathleen F. McConnell
For Respondent: Cota Cole & Associates, Dennis M. Cota and Carolyn J. Frank.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.