Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Carol Gilbert, Inc. v. Haller, No. H033193

By FindLaw Staff on November 25, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a case involving a default judgment arising from plaintiff's attempt to join defendant as a Doe defendant, which served a summons on defendant that omitted the requisite statutory notice that he was served by the fictitious name, denial of defendant's motion to vacate the default is reversed where, even if the trial court's rationale could ever sustain a default judgment over a defendant's objection that service did not comply with statutory requirements, the record does not show partial or colorable compliance with the requirement on which defendant's objection was predicated, and thus a finding of substantial compliance could not be sustained.  

Read Carol Gilbert, Inc. v. Haller, No. H033193 [HTML]

Read Carol Gilbert, Inc. v. Haller, No. H033193 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 24, 2009


Opinion by Judge Rushing

For Appellant:     Carr & Ferrell, Stuart C. Clark, Christopher P. Grewe

For Appellee:   Janin, Morgan & Brenner, David B. Tillotson, John A. Lofton

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard