Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Clement v. Alegre, No. A123168

By FindLaw Staff on September 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Trials court's imposition of discovery sanctions against plaintiffs for interposing objections to special interrogatories propounded by defendants is affirmed as sanctions were warranted where plaintiffs' objection to the term "economic damages" was without substantial justification and their responses to those interrogatories were evasive.   

Read Clement v. Alegre, No. A123168

Appellate Information

Filed September 23, 2009


Opinion by Judge Kline


For Appellant:  Samuel Goldstein & Associates, Samuel Elliot Goldstein, Law Offices of Stephanie J. Finelli, Stephanie Finelli

For Appelle:  Belzer, Hulchiy & Murray, Nicholas P. Hulchiy, Steven Barry Piser.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard