Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Forecast Homes, Inc. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

By FindLaw Staff on February 16, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Forecast Homes, Inc. v. Steadfast Ins. Co., G040876, the California Court of Appeals for the Fourth District addressed the issue of whether the self-insured retention (SIR) provision in the insurance policy purchased by subcontractors allowed for indemnity to the general contractor.

The Court affirmed the trial court's holding that, in looking at the pertinent forms of the policy, only the named insured subcontractors, not plaintiff, had the right to satisfy the SIR per occurrence amounts and defendant's defense obligation had not been triggered. 

In affirming the judgment in favor of the defendant, the Court also ruled that the SIR endorsements did not violate public policy and were not illusory. 

Related Resources:

Full Text of Forecast Homes, Inc. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard