Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Guided Legal Forms & Services: Sign In

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Crawford v. City of Los Angeles, No. B210821

By FindLaw Staff on June 25, 2009 5:07 PM

In an employment termination action, trial court judgment is reversed and remanded where: 1) trial court erred in ruling that two of the counts of the administrative charges were barred by the statute of limitations as the the court made a mathematical error and those charges were not time barred; and 2) the charge against plaintiff of alleging a false statement during an investigation is not time barred under the one-year statute of limitations contained in the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act as the factual scenario differs from that Alameida v. State Personnel Bd.    

Read Crawford v. City of Los Angeles, No. B210821 in PDF

Read Crawford v. City of Los Angeles, No. B210821 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David P. Yaffe, Judge. Reversed and remanded.
Filed June 24, 2009

Opinion by KRIEGLER, J.

For Petitioner: Diane Marchant

For Respondent: Rockard J. Delgadillo

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard