Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California, No. S155129

By FindLaw Staff on August 04, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute involving insurance liability coverage, court of appeals judgment is reversed where defendant had no duty to defend its insured party in the lawsuit brought against him by defendant as an insured party's unreasonable belief in the need for self-defense does not turn the resulting purposeful and intentional act of assault and battery into an "accident" within the policy's coverage clause.   

Read Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California, No. S155129 in PDF

Read Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California, No. S155129 in HTML

Appellate Information
Appeal from Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC045588.
Filed August 3, 2009

Judges
Before: BAXTER, J., GEORGE, C.J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., MORENO, J., CORRIGAN, J., KENNARD, J.
Opinion by KENNARD, J.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Glaser & Damone, Glaser, Damone & Schroeder and Robert P. Damone.

For Defendant: Reed Smith, Margaret Grignon, Judith E. Posner; Ford, Walker, Haggerty & Behar, Timothy L. Walker, Donna Rogers Kirby, Maxine J. Lebowitz and K. Michele Williams.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard