Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop, No. B206272

By FindLaw Staff on September 01, 2009 4:02 PM

In an appeal from the trial court's order quashing service of summons and process on the Archdiocese of Cashel & Emly in Ireland regarding alleged sexual molestation by clergy, the order is affirmed, where: 1) plaintiff waived the issue by his failure to fairly and completely set forth, discuss, and analyze the relevant facts under the applicable substantial evidence standard of review; and 2) substantial evidence supported the trial court's ruling that the defendant had insufficient contacts with the State of California to support an exercise of either general or specific jurisdiction.

Read Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop, No. B206272

Appellate Information

Filed August 31, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Rubin

Counsel

For Appellant:

John C. Manley, Manley & Stewart

For Respondent:

Nicholas W. Heldt, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, San Francisco, CA

Cynthia H. Plevin, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, San Francisco, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard