Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & Emly, No. B206272

By FindLaw Staff on September 02, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an appeal from the trial court's order quashing service of summons and process on the Archdiocese of Cashel & Emly in Ireland regarding alleged sexual molestation by clergy, the order is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff waived the issue by his failure to fairly and completely set forth, discuss, and analyze the relevant facts under the applicable substantial evidence standard of review; and 2) substantial evidence supported the trial court's ruling that defendant had insufficient contacts with the State of California to support an exercise of either general or specific jurisdiction. 

Read Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & Emly, No. B206272

Appellate Information

Filed August 31, 2009


Opinion by Judge Rubin


For Appellant:

John C. Manly and Vince W. Finaldi, Manly & Stewart

For Respondent:

Nicholas W. Heldt, Cynthia H. Plevin and Ryan L. Harrison, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard