Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Dotson v. Amgen, Inc., No. B212965

By FindLaw Staff on February 04, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's action for wrongful termination, trial court's denial of defendant's motion to compel arbitration on the ground that the provision concerning witness depositions was flawed is reversed as the language permitting the arbitrator to expand discovery upon a showing of need removes any taint of unconscionability from the agreement, and even if it's assumed to be unconscionable, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to severe it.  

Read Dotson v. Amgen, Inc., No. B212965 [HTML]

Read Dotson v. Amgen, Inc., No. B212965 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed February 3, 2010


Opinion by Judge Perren

For Appellant:  Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, James A. Zapp, Paul W. Cane, Jr., Jessica P. Boskovich; Nordman, Cormany, Hair & Compton, Jonathan Fraser Light, Meghan B. Clark

For Appellee:   Law Offices of Rob Hennig and Rob Hennig

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard