Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Drummond v. Desmarais, No. H031659

By FindLaw Staff on August 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a malicious prosecution action against plaintiffs' former attorney, judgment dismissing the action is affirmed where: 1) the trial court did not err in granting the special motion to strike the action for malicious prosecution based upon defendant's probate petition for fees, as plaintiffs cannot establish a favorable termination of the matter on the merits; and 2) the court did not err in dismissing plaintiffs' malicious prosecution suit based on defendant's own malicious prosecution complaint against them because, although the evidence supports a finding that defendant acted maliciously and without probable cause in suing his clients, defendant's voluntary dismissal of the suit was a technical disposition and not a termination on the merits in plaintiffs' favor as required.    

Read Drummond v. Desmarais, No. H031659 in PDF

Read Drummond v. Desmarais, No. H031659 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CV068316.
Filed August 5, 2009

Opinion by RUSHING, P.J.

For Plaintiff: Law Offices of Michael T. Morrissey, Michael T. Morrissey.

For Defendant: Willoughby, Stuart & Bening, Bradley A. Bening, Ellyn E. Nesbit, Law Offices of Michael G. Desmarais, Michael G. Desmarias.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard