Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In Suh v. Sup. Ct., No. B219174, the court of appeals was asked to review an order by the trial court compelling arbitration involving anesthesiology contracts entered into by the plaintiffs (anesthesiologists) with a hospital, arising from plaintiffs' lawsuit against a hospital alleging various causes of action including, age and national discrimination.
First, the court concluded that there was no evidence that plaintiffs were ever signatories to the agreement, and that as shareholders of a corporation, plaintiffs did not sign the agreement individually nor on behalf of the corporation.
In granting plaintiffs' petition for writ of mandate, the court held that they did not agree to arbitrate disputes relating to one of the contracts and that the terms of the arbitration clause in the other contract are unconscionable, rendering the agreement to arbitrate unenforceable.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: