Franchise Tax Bd. v. Superior Court (Gonzales), No. A122723
In a petition for a writ of mandamus overturning the trial court's denial of Petitioner Franchise Tax Board's motion to strike Respondent's jury trial demand, the petition is granted in part, where Respondent did not have a right to a jury trial on Petitioner's cross-complaint to recover a penalty; but denied in part, where a taxpayer was entitled to a trial by jury pursuant to article I, section 16 of the California Constitution in an action permitted by Revenue and Taxation Code section 19382.
Read Franchise Tax Bd. v. Superior Court (Gonzales), No. A122723
Filed August 27, 2009
Opinion by Judge Simons
Paul D. Gifford, Assistant Attorney General, Oakland, CA
William L. Carter, Deputy Attorney General, Oakland, CA
Martin A. Schainbaum, Martin A. Schainbaum, PLC, San Francisco, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.