Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Haro v. Ibarra, No. B213499

By FindLaw Staff on December 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action brought by doctors who were former shareholders of a medical corporation, trial court's dismissal of the complaint is reversed and remanded where: 1) the second amended complaint states a cause of action; and 2) equitable circumstances alleged in the case warrant an exception to the requirement that plaintiffs maintain continuous ownership of the shares in order to bring a shareholder derivative action.     

Read Haro v. Ibarra, No. B213499 [HTML]

Read Haro v. Ibarra, No. B213499 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed December 23, 2009


Opinion by Judge Chaney

For Appellant:   Nunziato Buckley Weber, Tom A. Nunziato and Illece Buckley Weber

For Appellee:   Christensen & Auer, Stephen G. Auer and Vicki C. Gadbois; Herzfeld & Rubin, Craig L. Winterman and Stephanie L. Rockey; Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, Warford & Stockalper, Robert C. Reback and Thien T. Nguyen

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard