Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Trial court judgment ordering defendant's monthly spousal support obligation be reduced is reversed where the court erred in ordering the reduction as plaintiff's rights to access the retirement accounts on a penalty-free basis and to any increase in their values are insufficient to constitute a material change of circumstances permitting a reduction in her spousal support under Family Code sec. 4320.
Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Clay M. Smith, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions.
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE
Filed: August 4, 2009
Opinion by FYBEL, J., O'LEARY, ACTING P.J., ARONSON, J.
Opinion by FYBEL, J.
For Respondent: Martin & McCormick, John D. Martin and Kathy J. McCormick.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: