Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001

By FindLaw Staff on November 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Trial court's order declaring plaintiff a putative spouse on the ground that the parties' marriage was invalid because the husband already had a wife when he married plaintiff is affirmed as, applying the unambiguous language of Family Code section 2251, the parties' union is a putative marriage and the property acquired during that union is quasi-marital property subject to division as community property. 

Read In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001 [HTML]

Read In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 25, 2009


Opinion by Judge McAdams

For Appellant:   Baskin & Grant, LLP, Caleb S. Baskin, Heidi Simonson

For Appellee:  Dolly Ares

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard