In re Preston, No. A122583
In a prosecution for possessing a counterfeiting device, a denial of a habeas petition is affirmed where petitioner's sentence was proper because the question of whether a parolee has remained free of prison custody depends on whether he has either remained on parole without revocation, or been discharged from custody, preceding the required continuous five year period.
Read In re Preston, No. A122583
Filed August 18, 2009
Opinion by Judge McGuinness
J. Bradley O'Connell
Rene A. Chacon, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.