Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc., No. B209486

By FindLaw Staff on February 09, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's suit against defendant employer seeking recovery of unpaid wages, denial of plaintiff's motion for class certification and subsequent motion for leave to amend complaint to substitute new class representative is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) except as to a finding that plaintiff is not an adequate class representative, trial court did not apply the applicable criteria as it is evident that common legal and factual issues predominate over any individual issues with respect to the meal and rest break claims; and 2) denial of motion for leave to file the First Amended Complaint is reversed with directions to file it nunc pro tunc.     

Read Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc., No. B209486 [HTML]

Read  Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc., No. B209486 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed February 8, 2010


Opinion by Judge Johnson

For Appellant:  Law Office of Joseph Antonelli, Joseph Antonelli, Janelle C. Carney, Law Office of Kevin T. BarnesGregg Lander

For Appellee:   Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Tracey A. Kennedy, Jason W. Kearnaghan, Kevin M. Rivera

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard