Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270

By FindLaw Staff on November 09, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiffs' suit against defendant for damages arising out of their sexual molestation by defendant's husband, trial court's judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) trial court properly sustained the demurrer with regard to plaintiffs' second and fifth causes of action for negligence; but 2) trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiffs' third and sixth causes of action for intentional misconduct.     

Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [HTML]

Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [PDF]

Filed November 6, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Pollak

Counsel

For Appellant:  Arnold I. Berschler

For Appellee:  Buresh, Kaplan, Jang & Feller, Lawrence A. Baker

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard