Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Lhotka v. Geographic Expeditions, Inc., No. A123725

By FindLaw Staff on February 01, 2010 12:25 PM

Trial court's denial of defendant's motion to compel arbitration of a wrongful death action brought by the survivors of one of its clients who died on a Mount Kilimanjaro hiking expedition is affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs made a sufficient showing to establish at least a minimal level of oppression to justify a finding of procedural unconscionability; 2) the arbitration clause was so one-sided as to be substantively unconscionable; and 3) it was within the court's discretion to conclude the agreement was so permeated by unconscionability that the interests of justice would not be furthered by severing the damages limitations clause and enforcing the remainder. 

Read Lhotka v. Geographic Expeditions, Inc., No. A123725 [HTML]

Read Lhotka v. Geographic Expeditions, Inc., No. A123725 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed January 29, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Siggins

Counsel
For Appellant:   Rubin, Hay & Gould, Rodney E. Gould, Walsworth, Franklin, Bevins & McCall, Laurie E. Sherwood, Alex F. Pevzner

For Appellee:  Law Offices of David J. Bennion, David J. Bennion, Law Office of Daniel U. Smith, Daniel U. Smith

Copied to clipboard