Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Manela v. Superior Court, No. B214447

By FindLaw Staff on September 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a marital dissolution action involving a discovery dispute over child custody, wife's petition for mandate, challenging a trial court's granting of the husband's motion to quash wife's subpoenas of medical records on the ground that the documents were protected by the physician-patient privilege, is granted in part and denied in part where: 1) the trial court abused its discretion by quashing the subpoena to a doctor where the statements were made in the wife's presence and therefore not protected by the privilege; 2) the husband's claim that his medical records are protected by his constitutional right to privacy is rejected as this right is not absolute and his privacy interests are outweighed by the state's compelling interest in protecting the child's best interests; and 3) the trial court did not abuse its discretion with respect to quashing the subpoena to a subsequent doctor because the documents sought by the wife were privileged.  

Read Manela v. Superior Court, No. B214447

Appellate Information

Filed September 23, 2009


Opinion by Judge Kitching


For Appellant: Gary J. Cohen 

For Appelle:  Law offices of Alexandra Leichter and Alexandra Leichter; Law Offices of Ariel Leichter-Maroko and Ariel Leichter-Maroko for Real Party In Interest

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard