Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

McCoy v. Gustafson, No. H030724

By FindLaw Staff on December 16, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action by homeowners against current and former owners of a laundry property alleging that oil flowing down from the laundry contaminated plaintiffs' property, jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs is reversed where: 1) trial court should have entered judgment in favor of the defendants based on the special verdict as it established the statute of limitations defense; 2) based on the lack of evidence at trial that the contamination of the downhill property is reasonably abatable, the jury could not have found otherwise, and this failure of proof did not result from any erroneous ruling by the trial court in connection with granting summary adjudication denying plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint, or limiting the expert testimony presented by plaintiff; and 3) trial court erred in granting the motion for new trial and denying the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.   

Read McCoy v. Gustafson, No. H030724 [HTML]

Read McCoy v. Gustafson, No. H030724 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed December 15, 2009


Opinion by Judge Rushing

For Appellant:   Kathleen P. Clack

For Appellee:   Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Gary L. Wollberg, Timothy J. Daley

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard