Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

M.S. v. O.S., No. D053996

By FindLaw Staff on August 10, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a paternity action, trial court order requiring defendant to pay child support is reversed and remanded where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in including his speculative bonus income in his gross annual income for purposes of calculating child support; and 2) the court abused its discretion by including his Indian tribe's payment of his attorney fees in his gross annual income under Family Code sec. 4058 (a) for purposes of the guideline support calculation, as the payments go directly to his attorneys and are not part of his income or cash flow available for child support, and thus may be considered only under Family Code sec. 4057 as a circumstance potentially warranting an upward departure from the guideline amount.    

Read M.S. v. O.S., No. D053996 in PDF

Read M.S. v. O.S., No. D053996 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Maureen F. Hallahan, Judge. Reversed with directions.
Filed: August 7, 2009

Opinion by MCCONNELL, P.J.

For Appellant: Matthew M. Kremer and Stephen Temko.

For Respondent: M.S. in pro. per.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard