Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Murray Co. v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd., No. B212674

By FindLaw Staff on December 15, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In proceedings arising from three citations by Cal-OSHA concerning unsafe practices regarding metal embossing machines and imposition of $25,600 in fines, plaintiff's petition for writ of administrative mandate challenging a decision by defendant-Board denying plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the dismissal of its appeals is affirmed where: 1) the Board did not exceed its powers in denying reconsideration and petitioner's claim that only a three-member panel can act as the Board is rejected; and 2) because citations are critical to proceedings before the Board, there was no error in the Board's ruling that plaintiff's failure to provide the citations was fatal to its appeals.     

Read Murray Co. v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd., No. B212674 [HTML]

Read Murray Co. v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd., No. B212674 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed December 14, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Manella

Counsel
For Appellant:   Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Eugene F. McMenamin and Jennifer D. Cantrell

For Appellee:   J. Jeffrey Mojcher, Chief Counsel, and Heidi B. Smith, Industrial Relations Counsel III

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard