Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784

By FindLaw Staff on November 25, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's suit on behalf of her deceased husband against his former employer claiming that his brain tumor was caused by exposure to toxic chemicals while working for Technicolor, plaintiff's petition challenging an order sustaining defendant's demurrer to a claim that plaintiff was injured by exposure to toxic chemicals and vapors on her husband's clothing and person that he brought home is denied where Technicolor does not owe plaintiff a duty of due care, as plaintiff's attempts to state a cause of action fall short of the Rowland criteria. 

Read Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784 [HTML]

Read Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 24, 2009


Opinion by Judge Flier

For Appellant:    Gonzalez & Robinson, Joseph D. Gonzalez and Keith A. Robinson

For Appellee:   Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, Hayward J. Kaiser and Paul Guelpa

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard