Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

People v. Cortez, G042891

By FindLaw Staff on November 11, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Imposition of "court facilities" fee on each conviction for committing lewd acts upon a child

People v. Cortez, G042891, concerned a challenge to the trial court's imposition of a $30 "court facilities" fee on each of defendant's convictions in six counts of committing lewd acts upon a child. 

In affirming, the court held that, because the scope of section 70373 can be logically construed in only one way - as applying to all criminal convictions, including traffic offenses under the Vehicle Code - the trial court did not err in concluding it applied to defendant's convictions for sex offenses.  Further, because section 70373 is not a punitive statute, either in intent or operation, the imposition of the court facilities fee mandated therein could not constitute a violation of ex post facto principles in this case.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard