Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

People v. Eddie L., No. C059237

By FindLaw Staff on July 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Juvenile court judgment sustaining defendant's count of robbery in the second degree and holding the maximum jurisdiction would be six years is affirmed where the plain meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code sec. 726 directs the juvenile court to impose the upper term of imprisonment, and thus the juvenile court did not err in selecting the upper term of five years for the robbery and adding one year for the arming enhancement.   

Read People v. Eddie L., No. C059237 in PDF

Read People v. Eddie L., No. C059237 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Richard H. Gilmour, Judge. Reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Filed July 2, 2009

Opinion by SIMS, J.

For Plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette and Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorneys General, Michael A. Canzoneri and Barton Bowers, Deputy Attorneys General.

For Defendant: Michael Allen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard