Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

People v. Scott, No. C059703

By FindLaw Staff on November 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's sentence as a three strikes offender after conviction for robbery and carjacking is affirmed as, by applying the definition of a "strike" as provided by the three strikes law, and by closely hewing to People v. Benson, in cases such as this, the trial court is not compelled to strike a strike, but must consider the closeness of the two strikes as an additional circumstance in conducting a Romero analysis.  

Read People v. Scott, No. C059703 [HTML]

Read People v. Scott, No. C059703 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 24, 2009


Opinion by Judge Butz

For Appellant:   Richard Power

For Appellee:   Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, and Jeffrey D. Firestone, Deputy Attorney General

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard