Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

People v. Smith, B219915

By FindLaw Staff on November 30, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Denial of motion to suppress in prosecution for marijuana possession for sale

People v. Smith, B219915, concerned a challnege to the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress, in a prosecution of defendant for marijuana possession for sale.  In affirming the decision, the court held that the two police officers and a deputy probation officer acted reasonably while searching defendant's apartment, and because the officer acted reasonably in opening a dryer door, the observation and seizure of the marijuana by the officer in plain view was reasonable.

As the court wrote: "Once the dryer door was opened, Officer Pearce testified he could see the marijuana.  Defendant does not contend the marijuana was not in plain view once the dryer door was opened.  Hence, if Officer Pearce acted reasonably in opening the dryer door, then the observation and seizure of the marijuana by Officer Pearce in plain view was reasonable."

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard