Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

People v. Smith, No. B212368

By FindLaw Staff on November 30, 2009 11:26 AM

In a prosecution of defendant for grand theft and securities crimes, trial court's admission of agreements executed by individuals named in dismissed counts is affirmed where: 1) the documents were authenticated by their content and by circumstantial evidence and their use did not violate the hearsay rule; 2) with respect to Evidence Code section 352, defendant did not raise an objection to the documents based on that provision; 3) even if the documents were improperly admitted, the evidence supporting the charges was so overwhelming that the use of the documents added little to the prosecution's case and any error was harmless; 4) with respect to alleged prosecutorial misconduct, it resulted from a misstatement and had no impact on the verdict; and 5) trial court did not err in its Pritchess review.     

Read People v. Smith, No. B212368 [HTML]

Read People v. Smith, No. B212368 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 25, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Manella

Counsel
For Appellant:   Mark S. Givens

For Appellee:   Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Susan D. Martynec and Lance E. Winters Sullivan, Deputy Attorneys General

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard