Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Ricketts v. McCormack, No. B210123

By FindLaw Staff on September 25, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a putative class action lawsuit against the County of Los Angeles and its registrar-recorder claiming failure to fulfill the statutory duties under Civil Code section 2941(c) to stamp and record reconveyances within two business days as required, trial court's judgment in favor of the defendants is affirmed as the indexing is a distinct function, separate from recording a document, and is not part of section 2941(c)'s stamp-and-record requirement.       

Read Ricketts v. McCormack, No. B210123

Appellate Information

Filed September 24, 2009


Opinion by Judge Perluss


For Appellant:  Hodges and Associates, A. Clifton Hodges and James S. Kostas

For Appelle: Robert E. Kalunian, Acting County Counsel, Steven J. Carnevale, Senior Assistant County Counsel, and Nancy M. Takade, Principal Deputy; Jones Day, Elwood Lui, Brian D. Hershman, John S. Sasaki and Peter E. Davids

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard