Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Ruling on Conservatorship Under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act

By FindLaw Staff on March 01, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Conservatorship of John L., No. S157151, the Supreme Court of California dealt with whether the trial court committed any statutory or due process violation in granting a petition to appoint a public conservator under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS Act).

In upholding the decision of the trial court, the Supreme Court held that the LPS was not violated when it excused the conservatee's production and proceeded with the hearing without his attendance. 

Furthermore, the conservatee's due process rights were not violated in establishing the conservatorship in the individual's absence, consistent with decisions in civil proceedings, that even where certain rights are implicated are substantial, they can be waived by an attorney with the client's express consent. 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard