Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Schellinger Brothers v. City of Sebastopol, No. A122972

By FindLaw Staff on December 03, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Trial court's decision not to interject itself into the still on-going process of preparing an EIR concerning plaintiff-developer's proposal to develop single-housing and commercial structures is affirmed where: 1) developer's contention that the one-year time limit for certifying an EIR established by CEQA section 21151.5 constitutes an iron-clad, one-size-fits-all rule that permits of no exception is rejected; 2) Gov. Code section 65589.5 cannot be used to halt the decision-making process specified by CEQA that is still on-going; and 3) developer's active participation in that process for more than three years, which included numerous changes in the size and composition of the project, after the date it now claims the city lost its discretionary amounts to laches.   

Read Schellinger Brothers v. City of Sebastopol, No. A122972 [HTML]

Read Schellinger Brothers v. City of Sebastopol, No. A122972 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed December 2, 2009


Opinion by Judge Richman

For Appellant:   Bingham McCutchen LLP, Geoffrey L. Robinson, Marie A. Cooper, Sean R. Marciniak

For Appellee:   Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Julia L. Bond, Edward Grutzmacher; McLaughlin & Hendrickson, Larry McLaughlin

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard