Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Steller v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., B219935

By FindLaw Staff on October 15, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Enforcement of settlement agreement in plaintiff's suit agianst former employer for disability discrimination and workers' compensation claims. 

Steller v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., B219935, concnerned a challenge to the trial court's interpretation of the parties' settlement agreement as encompassing both plaintiff's civil action for disability discrimination and a workers' compensation action, in enforcing the settlement agreement, in plaintiff's civil action for disability discrimination against her former employer.

In affirming the judgment, the court held that neither the settlement agreement nor the judgment expressly require that settlement of the workers' compensation claim be approved by the WCAB, but the judgment is construed as requiring the WCAB's subsequent approval.  Further, although the trial court should have considered extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent because the settlement agreement was ambiguous, the error was harmless as the trial court would have enforced the settlement even if it had considered the extrinsic evidence.

Related Link:

Read the California Court of Appeals for the Fourth District's Decision in Steller v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., B219935

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard