Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Tichinin v. City of Morgan Hill, No. H031019

By FindLaw Staff on September 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit against a city for adopting a resolution condemning him for hiring a private investigator to conduct surveillance of the city manager, trial court's grant of city's anti-SLAPP motion is reversed as plaintiff's 1983 action is based on conduct that qualifies for protection under the anti-SLAPP statute and  plaintiff made a prima facie showing of success on the merits where his evidence would support findings that: 1) he was engaged in conduct protected by the First Amendment rights to petition and right of free speech; 2) the city took adverse action in response to his conduct with the intent to retaliate against him and deter that conduct; and 3) the city's adverse action caused injuries that would deter a person of ordinary firmness from engaging in that conduct. 

Read Tichinin v. City of Morgan Hill, No. H031019

Appellate Information

Filed September 21, 2009


Opinion by Judge Rushing


For Appellant: Mesirow & Fink, Steven M. Fink, Law Offices of Bruce Tichinin, Bruce Tichinin For Appelle:   Burton, Volkmann & Schmal, Timothy J. Schmal, Burleigh E. Sabin

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard