Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Trivedi v. Curexo Tech. Corp., A127283

By FindLaw Staff on October 21, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Arbitration clause unconscionable in plaintiff's suit against former employer for wrongful termination

Trivedi v. Curexo Tech. Corp., A127283, involved a plaintiff's suit against his former employer for wrongful termination, asserting various causes of action, including age discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), race and color discrimination in violation of FEHA, and breach of the parties' employment contract. 


In affirming the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff's employment-related claims, the court held that the trial court's determination that the arbitration clause was procedurally and substantively unconscionable is supported by uncontroverted factors.  The court also held that the trial court did not err in refusing to sever the unconscionable provisions.

Realted Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard