Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. County of San Mateo, No. A122975

By FindLaw Staff on February 09, 2010 11:44 AM

In plaintiff's challenge to a county's assessment of ad valorem property taxes on certain areas leased in common by plaintiff within a rental car facility at San Francisco International Airport, judgment of the trial court is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff had the right to actual and physical occupation of the spaces areas pursuant to rights not granted to the general public, and therefore "possessed" or had a "right to possess" the spaces; 2) plaintiff retained sufficient authority and control over the spaces for its use to qualify as "independent"; and 3) plaintiff's rights under the National and Alamo leases were sufficiently "exclusive" to establish its possessory interests and to permit taxation.         

Read   Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. County of San Mateo, No. A122975 [HTML]

Read   Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. County of San Mateo, No. A122975 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed February 8, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Bruiniers

Counsel
For Appellant:   Van Loon & Associates, Paul L. Van Loon

For Appellee:   Michael P. Murphy, County Counsel, Lee A. Thompson, Deputy County Counsel

Copied to clipboard