Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Chiu, No. B209550

By FindLaw Staff on June 30, 2009 1:53 PM

Trial court judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages, interest, and costs related to defendant's theft of property is affirmed where a criminal restitution order under Penal Code sec. 1202.4 in favor of a victim of a crime does not preclude the victim or the victim's assignee from pursuing a separate civil action for restitution based on the same facts from which the criminal conviction arose.    

Read Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Chiu, No. B209550 in PDF

Read Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Chiu, No. B209550 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, R. Bruce Minto, Judge. Affirmed.
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE
Filed June 29, 2009

Judges
Before CROSKEY, J., KLEIN, P.J., ALDRICH, J.
Opinion by CROSKEY, J.   

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Anderson, McPharlin & Conners, David T. DiBiase and Joseph P. Tabrisky.
For Defendant: Megan A. Richmond.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard