Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Take Note: Inspector General Reports Troubling Practices at FBI

By Admin on January 21, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

The government's anti-terrorism investigations have been run, on occasion, by post-it note. That was just one of many inappropriate, possibly illegible and probably illegal methods the FBI reportedly has been using to obtain phone records from 2003 to 2006, according to a report released today. The Department of Justice Inspector General's report details the practices the FBI used to obtain phone records in the time period after the passage of the Patriot Act loosened the once strict requirements for gathering such information.

The report, "examines in detail the flawed practices that the FBI used to obtain thousands of telephone records, and the accountability of FBI employees for these troubling practices," Inspector General Glenn Fine said. One method under scrutiny is the widespread use of the "exigent circumstances letters" which were used to obtain evidence such as phone records without extended legal process in times of emergency. The report found the FBI issued over 700 letters from 2003 to 2006, many with no emergency actually in existence. The FBI is required by law to follow an exigent circumstance letter with a National Security Letter, a small, technical requirement it now appears was rarely followed.

The report further detailed the "informal" requests for least 3,500 telephone numbers made use of by agents including requests by email, in person, by practically leaning over the shoulder of a phone company employee and yes, by post-it note. The report quotes one senior FBI official saying the free for all methods were, "like having the ATM in your living room." Americans attached to the 4th Amendment can take small comfort in the statement by the FBI that it never obtained the content of any telephone conversations, only the telephone billing records.

The Bureau was further reported to have obtained phone records for reporters at the New York Times and the Washington Post without first obtaining approval from the Attorney General as required by federal regulation and department policy.

The report concludes that the Bureau's practices (not to mention record keeping methods) are "troubling," and represented a failure to comply with the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. In response, FBI director Robert Mueller told the Senate Judiciary Committee during an appearance Wednesday, that the FBI takes the concerns raised in the Inspector General's report "exceptionally seriously."

Related Resources:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard