Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

District of Columbia v. Straus, No. 09-7051

By FindLaw Staff on January 10, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act seeking attorney's fees from a lawyer who, on behalf of a special needs student, initiated administrative proceedings that were eventually dismissed as moot, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, because the district did not qualify as a prevailing party, it could not recover fees even if defendant continued to litigate inappropriately.

Read District of Columbia v. Straus, No. 09-7051

Appellate Information

Argued November 17, 2009

Decided January 8, 2010


Opinion by Judge Tatel


For Appellant:

Carl J. Schifferle and Donna M. Murasky, Assistant Attorney Generals, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Roxanne D. Neloms and Tilman L. Gerald, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard