Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Entergy Servs., Inc. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm., No. 07-1343

By FindLaw Staff on June 15, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a petition for review of FERC's resolution of a contract dispute between two energy providers, the petition is denied, where FERC's construction of the contract was reasonable based on the text and the parties' course of conduct.

Read the full decision in Entergy Servs., Inc. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm., No. 07-1343.

Appeal Information:

Argued October 7, 2008. Decided June 12, 2009.


Before SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and RANDOLPH and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.


Floyd L. Norton IV of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Erin M. Murphy.

Samuel Soopper, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Cynthia A. Marlette, General Counsel, and Robert H. Solomon, Solicitor.

Sean T. Beeny of Miller, Balis & O'Neil, P.C. argued the cause for intervenor. With him on the brief were Phyllis G. Kimmel and Milton J. Grossman.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard